|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Arnox
51
« on: April 06, 2010, 09:32:54 PM »
Whenever I see a topic or news article or what have you on government or business actions and/or regulations, I always seem to see 2 major sides of the issue.
First, you have the governments/businesses side of the story saying how what they're doing actually makes common sense and that we need this regulation or rule or that the judgment passed on a criminal is just.
But then, when I see people's opinions on other such forums, on the topics discussed above, the opinons and arguments are opposite. The government is trying to control our lives and that we shouldn't be such tools listening to them and join the right side.
But which side should one take? Most of the time, both present compelling and convincing arguments and it's hard to choose on which side to take.
But what do you guys think of all this?
52
« on: April 06, 2010, 09:18:44 PM »
More stupid. It reads like the 'gun control' debate on a large scale. The danger isn't the US, Britain, China, etc. having thousands of nukes; the danger is Al Queda or some other similar group getting one. They'd be certain to use it; and on civilians. I hardly think us reducing our stockpile or saying out loud when/how we would/wouldnt use nukes is going to have any effect on said group and their intentions.
End result - validating their opinion that the US is weak and should be destroyed.
I'm just glad I don't live near a heavily populated area, or an important one.
This. The cat's already been let out of the bag (nuclear weapons) and there's nothing we can do about it. And trying to get rid of our defense while hopefully pretending the WMD's will suddenly stop existing is NOT the answer at all. No wonder other countries are laughing at us. I'd laugh too. I just hope that they know that we don't support our presidents retarded decisions. Wait a second, why did we vote him into office then...
53
« on: April 06, 2010, 06:13:28 PM »
55
« on: March 03, 2010, 05:30:45 PM »
What's your's?
56
« on: February 18, 2010, 06:51:47 PM »
You sounda kinda like a jackass, to be honest. And why in the hell did you quote your post? I really hope that doesn't do anything for your post count. Urgh...
Ryan Philipp is the coolest name ever.
C'mon, Neo? And I accidentally quoted my post. Sorry.
57
« on: February 18, 2010, 06:43:47 PM »
Come to think of it, I've never seen Arnox and Evonus together. 
I see what your doing here. Well, you'll find out sooner or later that we are seperate people who don't even know each other by name.
58
« on: February 17, 2010, 05:42:20 PM »
Neo is pretty epic...
Neo is completely unoriginal and sounds kinda wannabe to be honest. Demos said Max Power but how 'bout Max Payne?  Another from me this time. How about "Art1f1c1al"?
59
« on: February 17, 2010, 05:25:03 PM »
No problems at all so far.
60
« on: February 17, 2010, 05:03:36 PM »
You're doing just fine, son. It's a zen thing. You'll get there when you stop wanting to get there. Or, for that matter, when you realize you've been there all along.
Very well but please don't take away my post count again. Though, if I were anybody else, I'll admit that would be pretty funny.
61
« on: February 16, 2010, 08:56:53 PM »
62
« on: February 16, 2010, 06:22:38 PM »
Now... how 'bout that original post count back?
63
« on: February 16, 2010, 05:07:46 PM »
Huh? You've got 20 more posts to go from the looks of things...
You. Son-of-a...  They see me postin', they hatin. I see (from the shout box history) this is a test to see if I can take crap without being a little you-know-what. Wink Lets put it this way faggots. I can take and deal punishment as necessary and if you guys want to get rid of me from this board than your going to have to ban me. I will not be rid of so easily. I can guarantee you guys that much. For better or worse, I'm stayin'. Now give me my original post count back. Please?
64
« on: February 15, 2010, 10:23:21 PM »
Because if its on the int3rnet it must be true Jailbait.
Kinda the joke there... jailbait.
65
« on: February 15, 2010, 09:20:23 PM »
No you won't.
I don't go in there.
But it says on your ID that your a hacker.
66
« on: February 15, 2010, 07:32:43 PM »
I take it you guys think this topic is crap.
67
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:56:02 PM »
No... Really?
Uh... Sarcasm?
68
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:47:52 PM »
Your point?
The SYSTEM user is just like root in linux in that you can do ANYTHING.
69
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:27:00 PM »
Go to run, type: cmd
In the prompt type: at (specify time in military format when you want the new command prompt to appear without parentheses of course) /interactive cmd.exe
Wait a minute for the time you specified in step 2 to come around
Close the old prompt
Open the task manager
End the process: explorer.exe
Close manager and type in new prompt: explorer
SYSTEM user is now accessed. You can close the prompt if you want now
To end this, simply go to the task manager and end the process: explorer.exe again.
Close it and then go to the task manager again
Go to new task in the file drop down menu and type: explorer
You will now be logged back in to your previous username. You will have to put your original wallpaper back on though I think.
70
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:17:40 PM »
7. Core 2 Extreme Done and done. See you guys at the tech forum. 
71
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:17:13 PM »
6. Core 2
72
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:16:17 PM »
5. i7 Core
73
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:15:44 PM »
4. Quad Core
74
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:13:48 PM »
3. First Pentium
75
« on: February 15, 2010, 06:13:24 PM »
2. Duo Core
|
