The Geek Forum

  • May 16, 2024, 04:45:53 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Due to the prolific nature of these forums, poster aggression is advised.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - Xeno Ghost

Pages: [1]
1
Political Opinions / USAToday's Poll on Gay Marriage Amendment
« on: February 26, 2004, 09:12:10 AM »
I'm sure you guys have had it up to here with this issue.

I just found it interesting that over 90% of those that have been polled are against a gay marriage amendment.

USAT Poll

2
Political Opinions / Peak Oil
« on: February 10, 2004, 08:33:12 PM »
Wasn't sure as to whether post this here or Anarchy, but then this is the "serious" topics forum.  So, here ya' go.

I think the dude is kind of like the people who go out and buy duct tape everytime Rumsfeld says we're going to be attacked.  A little eccentric and exaggerating.  Probably does NOT have a law degree like he claims.  This whole thing may be stupid and false.

But, one thing I think we can all agree on is that our natural oil supply will not last forever.  And we have to be getting a little close about now in running out of it.

The problem I see is the fact we don't have safeguards set in place for such an event.  It just seems like when it happens, the whole world will go out like a light.  Not that I'm complaining.  It'll get simple and Apocalyptic.  But simple is nice.  hah.   :roll:  Anyone ever see the global timeline of the world where you just watch like a map of the world and for every light it represents a million people and then, when the Bubonic Plague hits, like half the world's lights go out?  Yeah.  Kind of like that.

I am just surprised that after the Carter administration we haven't already started limiting our oil use.  But we haven't.  We increased it.  What, are the people fucking stupid?  Did they not get the hint?  *sigh*

Here:  Another Doomsayer

3
Political Opinions / Gen. Hawley's Message
« on: February 10, 2004, 06:53:20 PM »
This came to me by way of email. I can't validate it, but if you want, you can try.

However, I post this to focus on the message that is presented instead of whether or not it was truly said by retired USAF Gen. Hawley.

Quote
General Hawley's Politically Incorrect Message:

This Air Force General's comments surely represent all branches of the
service and all good thinking Americans. What a magnificent and
insightful view of what this war on terrorism is actually about. Please
read and pass on as you see fit. General Hawley, is a newly retired USAF
4 star general. He commanded the Air Combat Command [our front-line
fighters and bombers] at Langley AFB, VA. He is now retired and no
longer required to be politically correct.

"Since the attack [9-11], I have seen, heard, and read thoughts of such
surpassing stupidity that they must be addressed. You've heard them
too.

Here they are:

1) "We're not good, they're not evil, everything is relative." Listen
carefully: We're good, they're evil, nothing is relative. Say it with me
now and free yourselves. You see, folks, saying "We're good" doesn't
mean, "We're perfect." Okay? The only perfect being is the bearded guy
on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. The plain fact is that our country
has, with all our mistakes and blunders, always been and always will be
the greatest beacon of freedom, charity, opportunity, and affection in
history. If you need proof, open all the borders on Earth and see what
happens.

2) "Violence only leads to more violence." This one is so stupid you
usually have to be the president of an Ivy League university to say it.
Here's the truth, which you know in your heads and hearts already:
Ineffective, unfocused violence leads to more violence. Limp, panicky,
half measures lead to more violence. However, complete, fully thought
through, professional, well executed violence never leads to more
violence because, you see, afterwards, the other guys are all dead.

That's right, dead. Not "on trial," not "reeducated," not "nurtured
back into the bosom of love." Dead.

3) "The CIA and the rest of our intelligence community have failed us."
For 25 years we have chained our spies like dogs to a stake in the
ground, and now that the house has been robbed, we yell at them for not
protecting us. Starting in the late seventies, under Carter appointee
Stansfield Turner,  the giant brains who get these giant ideas decided
that the best way to gather international intelligence was to use spy
satellites. "After all, (they reasoned,) you can see a license plate
from 200 miles away." This is very helpful if you've been attacked by a
license plate. Unfortunately, we were attacked by humans. Finding humans
is not possible with satellites. You have to use other humans. When we
bought all our satellites, we fired all our humans, and here's the
really stupid part. It takes years, decades to infiltrate new humans
into the worst places of the world. You can't just have a guy who looks
like Gary Busey in a Spring Break '93 sweatshirt plop himself down in a
coffee shop in Kabul and say

"Hiya, boys. Gee, I sure would like to meet that bin Laden fella.
"Well, you can, but all you'd be doing is giving the bad guys a story
they'll be telling for years.

4) "These people are poor and helpless, and that's why they're angry at
us." Uh-huh, and Jeffrey Dahmer's frozen head collection was just a
desperate cry for help. The terrorists and their backers are richer than
Elton John and, ironically, a good deal less annoying. The poor helpless
people, you see, are the villagers they tortured and murdered to stay in
power. Mohammed Atta, one of the evil scum bags who steered those planes
into the killing grounds is the son of a Cairo surgeon. But you knew
this, too. In the sixties and seventies, all the pinheads marching
against the war were upper-middle-class college kids who grabbed any
cause they could think of to get out of their final papers and spend
more time drinking. It's the same today.

5) "Any profiling is racial profiling." Who's killing us here, the
Norwegians? Just days after the attack, the New York Times had an
article saying dozens of extended members of the gazillionaire bin Laden
family living in America were afraid of reprisals and left in a huff,
never to return to studying at Harvard and using too much Drakkar. I'm
crushed. Please come back. Let's all stop singing "We Are the World" for
a minute and think practically. I don't want to be sitting on the floor
in the back of a plane four seconds away from hitting Mt.Rushmore and
turn, grinning, to the guy next to me to say, "Well, at least we didn't
offend them"

SO HERE'S what I resolve for the New Year: Never to forget our murdered
brothers and sisters. Never to let the relativists get away with their
immoral thinking. After all, no matter what your daughter's political
science professor says, we didn't start this. Have you seen that bumper
sticker that says, "No More Hiroshimas"? I wish I had one that says, "No
More Pearl Harbors."


I think a lot of good and a lot of bad points were brought up in this message. True, murderers shouldn't be dealt with hugs and kisses, but false that killing people that had nothing to do with it solves the answer and keeps violence from spreading.

In any case, he sounds like a general. One that has been in the military way too long. The military is great. I will be a third generation officer as soon as I get out of college. But the military is a weapon and not a way of diplomacy. The answer isn't always found in an old general's words, and they can say what they think, but their opinions are no more than opinions.

So, what are your guys' thoughts on this?

4
Political Opinions / "No" To The Truth
« on: January 30, 2004, 04:44:58 PM »
Intel Probe into Iraq

Quote
WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) said Friday "I want to know the facts" about any intelligence failures concerning Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s alleged cache of forbidden weapons but he declined to endorse calls for an independent investigation.


The issue of an independent commission has blossomed into an election-year problem for the president, with Democrats and Republicans alike supporting the idea. Former chief weapons inspector David Kay has concluded that Iraq (news - web sites) did not possess weapons of mass destruction, which Bush had cited as a rationale for going to war against Iraq.


Bush said he wants to be able to compare the administration's prewar intelligence with what will be learned by inspectors who are now searching for weapons in Iraq. There is no deadline for those inspectors, the Iraq Survey Group, to complete their work.


Rest of the story in the link....

This is good for the Democrats.  

In any case, nothing says, "I'm hiding something under my bed, don't look, Ma!" like turning down an independent investigation.

5
Hardware, Software, and Other Imperialist Crap / Earth vs. Landmines
« on: January 28, 2004, 04:19:28 PM »
A New Flower

I found this topic absolutely interesting.  I know this might not be considered "Technology" and suitable for this forum, but I wasn't sure if it went anywhere else.

If you consider advances in Bioengineering technology, then I guess it goes here.

Amazing what this kind of stuff could be used for.  Possibly you could use these things to find natural resources as well.

6
Political Opinions / Paul O'Neill
« on: January 28, 2004, 04:13:29 PM »
Plans For Invasion

So, I didn't notice if this has been brought up here or not, but what do you guys think of this tidbit of news?

It'll probably be overshadowed until the Primaries are over, but I think that the Democratic canidate would be wise to try and make as much light on this as possible.

I, obviously, find it as another link to prove that Bush lied to America and even possibly the UK.

I personally don't support what happened, and this really kind of rocks my boat some, but I know that others see it as something that's been talked about since the end of the First Gulf War and this administration just brought it up in paperwork.

7
Political Opinions / Kerry and New Hampshire
« on: January 28, 2004, 03:51:28 PM »
So, after the primary hit New Hampshire, it seems Kerry is on top again.

This was kind of an important time for Dean, and he needed this state to hold up his image of the top canidate.  Seems now he'll be on damage control.

So, what is everyone's take on these primaries hinting that Kerry and Edwards are some of the favorites of the Democratic peoples?

I personally am going for Clark, but he's not done all that great.  But hell, Super Tuesday isn't until March 2nd, so I won't be too quick to say that the selection is being made now.

8
New Geeks on the Block / Greetings
« on: January 27, 2004, 09:52:22 PM »
Hello all, I'm a regular forum poster, or have been, but I've been wanting a change from the places I have been posting at.  (No, not those places, but other decent places.)

Noticed there was a section for this kind of thing, so I thought that I would jump in like everyone else and post a, "Hey, I'm a newb," thread.

I hope that I can be of some use to this site as I think you can be for me.

Thanks!

Pages: [1]