I don't know, but I found this on the back ...
***[Disclaimer~Announcer guy voice ensues]::
Concurrence is limited to a specific Fundamental Dependency and does not denote agreement with other interfaces or the process as a whole but only to the portion wherein there actually exists a Concurrence . By definition, a process is owned by the developing poster, and the developing poster has the authority to approve its internal processes.
If an approved document is revised, the review shall be performed by the same organizations that performed the original review, unless specifically designated otherwise. Multiple Reconcurrence on fundamental dependencies should be reassessed whenever changes to the process, or policy[ies] underlying the process, are made and the master post updated. If nothing about the Fundamental Dependency changes, then reconcurrence may not be needed.
Offices requested to concur on fundamental dependencies may decide the level within the organization, e.g., Associate Poster, Post Poster, or Post Toaster, where concurrence needs to occur to ensure commitment to perform the reconcurrence. Otherwise,Concurrence is optional.