The Geek Forum

  • May 09, 2024, 09:10:38 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Due to the prolific nature of these forums, poster aggression is advised.

*

Recent Forum Posts

Shout Box

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 129621
  • Total Topics: 7185
  • Online Today: 154
  • Online Ever: 1013
  • (January 12, 2023, 01:18:11 AM)
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Arizona  (Read 8114 times)

12AX7

  • Guest
Re: Arizona
« Reply #25 on: April 05, 2007, 02:47:58 PM »

No offense
Absolutely none taken.
but your politicians and law enforcers are taking the terrorism bit a little to far.
concur
While the whole situation seems completely absurd to me
concur
it in no way suprises me to see such actions in the US.
concur
  :-(
Logged

12AX7

  • Guest
Re: Arizona
« Reply #26 on: April 05, 2007, 02:53:46 PM »

it makes Americans look like total idiots to outsiders.
Well, hopefully, it'll make American law look idiotic; and the outsiders know better than to think we're all the same mindset.
Logged

RelandR

  • Wannabe Professional Blogger
  • **
  • Coolio Points: +91/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 535
  • This portion of the page intentionally left blank
    • View Profile
Re: Arizona
« Reply #27 on: April 05, 2007, 02:59:15 PM »

None taken here either.

The very *lack* of surprise just adds so much to the disturbing nature here. It is becoming far too commonplace [no-surprise] for US to regress socially , ie: executing the retarded, trying 10 - 15 year olds as adults, etc, and now this bit o' B.S.

Seems the further we go, the behinder we get, and the immoral majority seem quite happy with that.  :oops:
« Last Edit: April 05, 2007, 03:12:16 PM by RelandR »
Logged

Demosthenes

  • Evil Ex-HN Moderator
  • Administrator
  • Hacker
  • *
  • Coolio Points: +567/-72
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 9904
  • Just try me. See what happens.
    • View Profile
    • Zombo
Re: Arizona
« Reply #28 on: April 05, 2007, 03:45:17 PM »

Absolutely none taken.concurconcurconcur
  :-(

Concur.   :-(
Logged

Coolio Points: 89,000,998,776,554,211,222
Detta Puzzle Points: 45

Banning forum idiots since 2001

pbsaurus

  • Hacker
  • ****
  • Coolio Points: +354/-31
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 9981
  • Everyone Loves The King Of The Sea
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/flipperpete
Re: Arizona
« Reply #29 on: April 05, 2007, 04:02:22 PM »

Explains

RelandR

  • Wannabe Professional Blogger
  • **
  • Coolio Points: +91/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 535
  • This portion of the page intentionally left blank
    • View Profile
Re: Arizona
« Reply #30 on: April 05, 2007, 04:53:20 PM »

I don't know, but I found this on the back ...

***[Disclaimer~Announcer guy voice ensues]::
Concurrence is limited to a specific Fundamental Dependency and does not denote agreement with other interfaces or the process as a whole but only to the portion wherein there actually exists a Concurrence .  By definition, a process is owned by the developing poster, and the developing poster has the authority to approve its internal processes.

If an approved document is revised, the review shall be performed by the same organizations that performed the original review, unless specifically designated otherwise.  Multiple Reconcurrence on fundamental dependencies should be reassessed whenever changes to the process, or policy[ies] underlying the process, are made and the master post updated.  If nothing about the Fundamental Dependency changes, then reconcurrence may not be needed.   

Offices requested to concur on fundamental dependencies may decide the level within the organization, e.g., Associate Poster, Post Poster, or Post Toaster, where concurrence needs to occur to ensure commitment to perform the reconcurrence. Otherwise,Concurrence is optional.
Logged

Evonus

  • Whipping Boy
  • Hacker
  • *
  • Coolio Points: +158/-296
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1066
  • ZE TROLL KING!
    • View Profile
Re: Arizona
« Reply #31 on: April 05, 2007, 07:28:45 PM »

It is interesting to see Arizona's definition of terrorism:
Seems rather broad to me.

I'd say that's the biggest problem with the legislation.
Logged
"Did you name your mole Avogadro?" -PBsaurus
Pages: 1 [2]