51
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2012 Movie Thread
« on: January 04, 2012, 11:04:23 AM »
If you don't follow the rules, do you have to use your spatula on yourself?
Due to the prolific nature of these forums, poster aggression is advised.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
51
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2012 Movie Thread« on: January 04, 2012, 11:04:23 AM »
If you don't follow the rules, do you have to use your spatula on yourself?
52
Political Opinions / Re: The War On Terror and the White House Poll: Part Four« on: January 03, 2012, 06:15:01 PM »
Kryzec and Cat in the same 7.5 year year old thread, on the same day!? What the fuck is going on here? Did we start the takeover and nobody told me!!!??
53
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2012 Book Thread« on: January 03, 2012, 04:40:24 PM »1. Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Sea of Monsters by Rick Riordan Currently reading: Red Mist by Patricia Cornwell Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter bySeth Grahame Smith Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters 54
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / 2012 Movie Thread« on: January 02, 2012, 06:26:44 PM »
Also by request, here's the new movie thread.
55
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / 2012 Concert Thread« on: January 02, 2012, 06:26:20 PM »
By request, here's the new concert thread.
56
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2012 Book Thread« on: January 02, 2012, 12:00:46 PM »
As always, I set no goal for this because I read too much anyway.
Already read: 1. Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Sea of Monsters by Rick Riordan Currently reading: Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Titans Curse by Rick Riordan Red Mist by Patricia Cornwell Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter bySeth Grahame Smith Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters 57
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / 2012 Book Thread« on: January 02, 2012, 11:54:58 AM »
You all know the routine...same rules as the 2011 book thread.
58
Hardware, Software, and Other Imperialist Crap / Re: I'm Lazy!« on: December 14, 2011, 07:12:08 PM »
Thanks guys!
Seems to me that if I'm currently okay with 250W and the only thing I'm changing out is the vid card (to one that requires a 300W minimum) then I should be okay with upgrading the power supply to 300W. Any major flaws in that logic? 59
Entertainment / Re: Fave Book??« on: December 13, 2011, 03:54:51 PM »I read those when I was 17. It was literary porn to me.HUGE THREAD BUMP!!! Sorry for that...I missed this thread originally. Uh, they are literary porn. I own the trilogy and have reread them enough that the spines are broken and they're pretty beat up. Good stories, but make no mistake...it's pretty hardcore porn. 60
Hardware, Software, and Other Imperialist Crap / I'm Lazy!« on: December 13, 2011, 01:19:02 PM »
Ok, I really don't feel like doing any homework, so can someone please hand me an answer on a silver platter? My video card is about to crap out. PC is a few years old. Current power supply is rated at 250W, and most of the video cards I find are rated at 300W minimum. Two questions:
1. Do I really have to have a 300W power supply or are they trying to extort me into buying additional hardware? 2. If I really do need a new power supply, can I just get one and install it, or will it fry my motherboard (see comment about current power supply being rated at 250W)? 61
Political Opinions / No idea what to title this thread« on: December 01, 2011, 04:38:35 PM »
One of our local news outlets (azcentral.com) is changing their commenting system. Gone is the anonymous account registered via the website. The new system will require people who want to comment to have a FB account and their comments will be linked to their FB account. Effectively, if I comment on an article, my name will be there for all the world to see. The decision makers at the paper claim that they're trying to bring back civil discourse by forcing people to be accountable for their words. My cynical nature just think they're entered into some sort of financial agreement with FB. That aside, what do you guys think?
62
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: The Apparently Necessary Random Stuff Thread« on: November 29, 2011, 04:03:51 PM »
Weird Tingly Feeling, 12!?
Where did you get that? 63
Anarchy / Happy Thanksgiving!« on: November 24, 2011, 12:16:17 PM »
Yeah, the subject says it all. Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
64
Political Opinions / Personhood Fails in Mississippi« on: November 09, 2011, 02:02:22 PM »
Interesting development there. If I had to list the states where I would expect a personhood amendment to pass, MS would have been on the list. Looks like the personhood movement is targetting Florida, Ohio and South (or North, don't remember which) Dakota next.
65
Anarchy / Re: Guess what, 12!« on: November 09, 2011, 01:59:15 PM »
Happy belated birthday....sorry I missed it!
66
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: The Apparently Necessary Random Stuff Thread« on: November 02, 2011, 11:17:52 PM »
I've seen Xolik's gay agenda. It's impressive.
67
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2011 Book Thread« on: October 27, 2011, 11:59:18 AM »I always assumed that was his first name.LOL! I don't know if ivan actually got that reference. 68
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2011 Book Thread« on: October 26, 2011, 12:36:48 PM »
His first name is never referred to, but I can only assume that there's ONE Flagg in Stephen King's universe.
69
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2011 Book Thread« on: October 25, 2011, 02:13:41 PM »
I originally read it many many years ago, and it's always stuck with me as being a really good book. I starting thinking about it again recently, and went digging through my library to re-read it. No dice. It's gone mising over the years. So I went to Barnes & Noble and bought another copy. It's definitely as good as I remember. Not at all what I would consider 'typical' Stephen King (although Flagg is a major character in the book).
70
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2011 Book Thread« on: October 25, 2011, 10:52:00 AM »Since I'm such a chain reader, I don't ever set a goal. So, I'll just maintain a list of what I read this year. Currently reading Hyperspace by Michio Kaku (still) and The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand and You Suck: A Love Story by Christopher Moore and The Science of Fear by Daniel Gardner. 71
Anarchy / Re: HAPPY RAPTURE DAY, SINNERS!« on: October 21, 2011, 11:54:05 AM »
You know, it's kinda funny...I'm kinda starting to almost feel bad for this old guy.
72
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: The Apparently Necessary Random Stuff Thread« on: September 27, 2011, 01:36:03 PM »
I just had an entertaining Cryptonomicon moment.
BACKGROUND: I am working from home today. I do not normally eat Cap'n Crunch, but I do keep a box of it around for the rare occasion that the craving strikes. The craving struck this morning. I got everything out and lined up on the counter: bowl, spoon, cereal, milk. I poured the cereal in the bowl, poured the milk in and began to shovel in the cereal. Shovel in the cereal because, of course, if you go too slow you lose the crunchy aspect of the cereal. Even with my rapid rate of consumption, I was still only halfway through when I realized that the milk was now a couple degrees warmer and the cereal was just past its ideal crispiness/crunchiness. Then I remembered that I read about this particular issue in a book somewhere. Then I remembered that it was Cryptonomicon. 73
Anarchy / Re: Humanimals« on: September 26, 2011, 11:34:02 PM »I dare you to Google Goatse,You're new here, aren't you? 74
Sticky Stuff (no pun intended) / Re: 2011 Book Thread« on: September 19, 2011, 12:42:30 PM »Since I'm such a chain reader, I don't ever set a goal. So, I'll just maintain a list of what I read this year. Currently reading Hyperspace by Michio Kaku (still) and The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand and You Suck: A Love Story by Christopher Moore and The Science of Fear by Daniel Gardner. 75
New Geeks on the Block / Re: couch fort Help???« on: August 18, 2011, 06:07:54 PM »Huh. I like that too.This makes the assumption that fans of the original are fans because of Shatner. What do you propose to call those who are fans because of the inimitable Leonard Nimoy? |