Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ivan
Pages: 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189
4626
« on: June 14, 2006, 04:45:57 PM »
Agree with the Pasadena Freeway rant. Screw that horrible, horrible freeway.
It is. It's more like an aqueduct than a freeway. And there is no way anyone can merge in at anything approaching speed limit, unless they have some kind of jet assisted engines. But there is NO excuse for anyone merging onto a regular freeway at 30 mph off a quarter-mile on-ramp! I could get up to speed on a friken bicycle.
4627
« on: June 14, 2006, 03:29:29 PM »
You're right. I was actually thinking of Flavor Aid. Grape, to be precise.
4628
« on: June 14, 2006, 03:20:46 PM »
I thought it was Kool-Aid.
4629
« on: June 14, 2006, 02:17:58 PM »
It takes me about 7 minutes to get nice and clean, shampoo my hair and scrub behind the ears.
4630
« on: June 14, 2006, 01:06:26 PM »
Yes!
Also, you would say "The color of my American neighbour's lawn is much greener than the colour of mine."
4631
« on: June 14, 2006, 12:05:50 PM »
The Pasadena Freeway was, I believe, the first freeway in the LA area. I haven't driven it in maybe 15 years, and it may have undergone some renovation in that time, but the thing I remember most about it is that the on- and off-ramps are really short. Merging onto the freeway is more like turning right on a red light. Same with exiting. Since the Pasadena Freeway was built, our ideas of what a freeway should be like has evolved. I commute mostly on freeways that have been either built or renovated in the last 5-10 years. There was also a lot of open space where these roads were built, so the lanes are wide, the shoulders capacious, and the on- and off-ramps are long enough for a 747 to take off of.
All this encourages speeding, something I no longer do. As a reformed motorist painfully cognizant of the cost of insurance and the long-term repurcussions of speeding tickets, I habitually keep to the rightmost lane, my cruise control set boldly and daringly at 1 mph above the local speed limit, which is 65 mph in most cases. Less prudent -- or more late -- motorists whizz by me to the left, but I don't let it bother me, as I happily sup my coffee and listen to NPR. What I don't understand, given the mile-long on-ramps prevalent along my route, is why is there always one bozo who doesn't understand what the on-ramp is for and merges in front of me at 40 miles per hour you GODDAM MORON causing me to slow down, thus wasting gas and brakepads, only to speed up after a minute and zoom away at 85 mph?
Sheesh!
4632
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:18:21 AM »
You can recognize your neighbor, and you can recognise your neighbour, but you should never recognize your neighbour or recognise your neighbor.
Got it?
4633
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:06:37 AM »
Yeah, that gets me into more trouble...
4634
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:03:47 AM »
Well, in the mean time, we can always talk about Michelle Malkin.
4635
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:03:00 AM »
Oh.
4636
« on: June 13, 2006, 04:59:43 PM »
Well, that's useful.
4637
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:47:15 PM »
My bios are all spelled correctly, but they are all lies.
LIES!!!
4638
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:24:32 PM »
I have Netherland's goalie in my fantasy. He's been amazing.
Mmmmm.... Dutch soccer slash..
4639
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:21:38 PM »
This broad needs a spell check function.
Yeah, I could use one of them too.
4640
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:19:47 PM »
Actually, we were all done talking about her.
4641
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:16:57 PM »
What about: "Cat's got your tongue?"
Cat has --> Cat's.
Hi there.
Well... Hel lo Cat!
4642
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:16:09 PM »
Also I don't really like the phrase has got. It's just redundant. Just say has.
Cat's your tongue? I wouldn't've ever thunk to say it that way.
4643
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:12:02 PM »
Is relativity itself relative?
4644
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:04:21 PM »
You're confusing me.
4645
« on: June 13, 2006, 03:03:00 PM »
What about: "Cat's got your tongue?"
Cat has --> Cat's.
4646
« on: June 13, 2006, 02:45:44 PM »
Well, that's easy for YOU to say, not being a peabrain or a small animal.
4647
« on: June 13, 2006, 01:25:07 PM »
Two days ago, the above exchanges with Waldo would've made my branes boil, resulting in a possibly ill-advised torrent of opprobrium.
But after Asterisk's Avalanche of Asininity, I have nothing but fond feelings towards Waldo.
What a difference a day makes.
4648
« on: June 13, 2006, 01:08:08 PM »
QsOTD: Is it unreasonable for me to ask new people to answer 3 of the questions in this thread? Is it confusing?
a) No. b) Yes, to peabrains and small animals.
4649
« on: June 13, 2006, 12:42:45 PM »
4650
« on: June 13, 2006, 12:32:32 PM »
Its' -- posessive case of the posessive case of it as a pronoun.
Ex. Its' proper spelling eludes some.
Pages: 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189
|