The Geek Forum

Main Forums => Entertainment => Topic started by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:05:22 PM

Title: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:05:22 PM
I live under a rock and so I just found out that Kevin Spacey plays Lex Luthor in the new Superman movie.  Now I wanna PeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

I can't wait to see this movie!!  But it probably won't be for a while since we're busy planning "the biggest, most spectacular fireworks show in the Richmond area" (BTW, its gonna rain and we don't have rain insurance), but also because I hear you have to see the first one to get it.  My person is a little boy who was  born a few years after the first one came out.  So we have to rent that first.

AND THAT ALSO MAKES ME WANNA PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Christopher Reeve as Supe.  Love it.


Hot

Superman

ACTION!!!
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:10:09 PM
(http://www.dailycollage.com/collages/reeve/01-christopher-reeve-1024x768.jpg)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on June 28, 2006, 06:11:46 PM
I probably won't even bother.  Hate sequels and remakes.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:13:10 PM
Why?
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: ivan on June 28, 2006, 06:14:44 PM
I, too, wanna peeeeeeeeeeEEEEEeeee, but for entirely different reasons.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:15:34 PM
Why?
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on June 28, 2006, 06:16:43 PM
Why?

Stupid
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:17:40 PM
Disagree
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:17:54 PM
(http://i.esmas.com/image/0/000/003/796/superd_T.jpg)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: ivan on June 28, 2006, 06:20:02 PM
Why?
coffee, tea, water
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:20:30 PM
stupid
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 28, 2006, 06:20:43 PM
(http://www.pixeljoint.com/files/icons/pee.gif)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on June 28, 2006, 07:01:20 PM
Disagree

:wyh
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on June 29, 2006, 11:22:18 AM
(http://www.miniwaankerbot.com/images/detta/smilies/wyh.gif)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: IFOUNDWALDO176 on July 03, 2006, 09:30:03 PM
I went to see Superman Returns today, it was a good movie, but it would probably be something that (if it were out on VHS or DVD) I would rent rather than own. Then again, this is just my opinion on the subject, so take it for what its worth.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TheJudge on July 05, 2006, 08:02:44 AM
I saw it last night and all I can say is this: Now I know what a woman feels like when she has multiple and simultanious orgasims.


There are some aspects of the movie I didn't like, but they were minor in the end. There's a couple of inconsistencies but I guess there always were in all SM movies. Every movie has flaws. Over all, it was fun to watch, the story was good, and they left a lot of doors open for future movies.

Making this movie a success was not an easy task because Superman is big shoes to fill, but they were able to make good linkages with the 1st two movies, and did a good job representing the original characters. Kevin Spacey was awsome! The only thing with this character is that they didn't make him narcistic enough. After all, Lex Luther is supposed to be the self proclaimed greatest criminal mind of our time! But he didn't say it.  :x

As far as Brandon what's his face ( the guy who plays superman), when he opened his mouth the first time and said his first few lines, I thought to myself "uh oh... This guy is going to suck" but I was wrong. He did a good job. I just needed 5 minutes to get used to him.

Now, I have a question about timelines. I'll use small text because of spoiler content.

In the original Superman movie, when his parents send him to earth in the tinfoil snowflake craft, he's a baby. When he actually gets to earth, he's grown and he's a small boy. It's like he was 1 yeard old when he left, and maybe like 6 when he arrived, making this a 5 year trip one way.

In SM returns, they say he has been gone for 5 years. SM says he went to visit his home world, and we saw him come back to earth in a tinfoil snowflake craft. So I'm confused about a lot of things. Did superman fly to his homeworld initially? If so, why didn't he fly back, why did he come back in a spacecraft instead? And more importantly, where did he find it? His entire planet was blown to bits thousands of years ago!

Another thing I didn't like is the part where SM carries the "new continent" into space. He's basically carrying a rock of cryptonite and it doesn't affect his powers: He's strong, and he can fly. Then, he gets hit by a tiny shard and basically dies. The fact that the proximity to cryptonite didn't affect him at all is lame. Espcially when just moments before, Lex was able to punch him and beat the crap out of him because SM had lost his special abilities just by being neare the cryptonite.

Oh, something else I didn' t like... During the big plane carying the space shuttle scene, we see lois get throw from row 1 to row 34 back and forth, she's getting slammed all ovber the place, yet she is not hurt one bit. No blood, no bruises, nothing! And WHY DIDN'T ANY OF THE OTHER PASSENGERS USE THEIR PUKE BAGS???

Ok that's all. I like everything else.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: MISTER MASSACRE on July 05, 2006, 12:50:41 PM

In the original Superman movie, when his parents send him to earth in the tinfoil snowflake craft, he's a baby. When he actually gets to earth, he's grown and he's a small boy. It's like he was 1 yeard old when he left, and maybe like 6 when he arrived, making this a 5 year trip one way.

In SM returns, they say he has been gone for 5 years. SM says he went to visit his home world, and we saw him come back to earth in a tinfoil snowflake craft. So I'm confused about a lot of things. Did superman fly to his homeworld initially? If so, why didn't he fly back, why did he come back in a spacecraft instead? And more importantly, where did he find it? His entire planet was blown to bits thousands of years ago!

Another thing I didn't like is the part where SM carries the "new continent" into space. He's basically carrying a rock of cryptonite and it doesn't affect his powers: He's strong, and he can fly. Then, he gets hit by a tiny shard and basically dies. The fact that the proximity to cryptonite didn't affect him at all is lame. Espcially when just moments before, Lex was able to punch him and beat the crap out of him because SM had lost his special abilities just by being neare the cryptonite.

Oh, something else I didn' t like... During the big plane carying the space shuttle scene, we see lois get throw from row 1 to row 34 back and forth, she's getting slammed all ovber the place, yet she is not hurt one bit. No blood, no bruises, nothing! And WHY DIDN'T ANY OF THE OTHER PASSENGERS USE THEIR PUKE BAGS???

Ok that's all. I like everything else.


Small for spoilers!


In the original Superman story, he arrives as a baby - and the craft is pretty much only his size (which is why Jor-El and company had to get all blowed up), so it doesn't really make sense with the craft no matter which way you slice it. I call it lazy writing, but it's not really that big a deal. He says scientists located his planet, but that's just stupid. The entire thing was done as a way to remove Superman from Earth for those five years they needed to advance the plot.

I scoffed at the carrying of Kryptonite mountain as well, but then remembered that moments before he had flown up and basked in the sun for a while; I doubt it would make that extreme a difference, but Superman is supposed to be powered (and apparently supercharged) by our sun.

Lois gets tossed all over the place and is fine because she gave birth to Superman's son, and mabye some Kryptonite DNA got all messed around in her. That's completely conjecture and silly-talk btw.

My problem with the movie was with Lex Luthor. Aside from he and Superman basically not talking at all, which should have been the highlight of the movie, they're kept apart (and not talking) until the very end, where it's more or less "Hey jerk you sent me to prison KAPOW!". In addition, what the fuck kind of plan did Lex actually have? When asked what would stop the rest of the world from coming after his new boring continent, he's all "I will have alien technology! ARRRR" but he didn't actually bother to learn how to use it before drawing a shitton of attention to himself. Ok, so you krypto-shanked Superman. What would you have done if an attack helicopter showed up? Oh, nothing. He had almost infinite knowledge thanks to alien races, and all he does is fire a cannon into the ocean so he can chill on the Island of Uncomfortableness. GREAT PLAN LEX
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TheJudge on July 05, 2006, 01:34:53 PM



In the original Superman story, he arrives as a baby - and the craft is pretty much only his size (which is why Jor-El and company had to get all blowed up), so it doesn't really make sense with the craft no matter which way you slice it. I call it lazy writing, but it's not really that big a deal. He says scientists located his planet, but that's just stupid. The entire thing was done as a way to remove Superman from Earth for those five years they needed to advance the plot.

I scoffed at the carrying of Kryptonite mountain as well, but then remembered that moments before he had flown up and basked in the sun for a while; I doubt it would make that extreme a difference, but Superman is supposed to be powered (and apparently supercharged) by our sun.

Lois gets tossed all over the place and is fine because she gave birth to Superman's son, and mabye some Kryptonite DNA got all messed around in her. That's completely conjecture and silly-talk btw.

My problem with the movie was with Lex Luthor. Aside from he and Superman basically not talking at all, which should have been the highlight of the movie, they're kept apart (and not talking) until the very end, where it's more or less "Hey jerk you sent me to prison KAPOW!". In addition, what the fuck kind of plan did Lex actually have? When asked what would stop the rest of the world from coming after his new boring continent, he's all "I will have alien technology! ARRRR" but he didn't actually bother to learn how to use it before drawing a shitton of attention to himself. Ok, so you krypto-shanked Superman. What would you have done if an attack helicopter showed up? Oh, nothing. He had almost infinite knowledge thanks to alien races, and all he does is fire a cannon into the ocean so he can chill on the Island of Uncomfortableness. GREAT PLAN LEX


Good points. But regardless, did you like the movie?
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: MISTER MASSACRE on July 05, 2006, 01:37:17 PM
Good points. But regardless, did you like the movie?

I thought it was OK -  it could have been much better if only they had put a bit more effort into the plot. Dialogue was also lacking. I have to admit computers have done wonders for those flying scenes though. I watched Superman 2 a few weeks back and laughed my ass off.

KNEEL BEFORE ZOD
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: foundation on July 07, 2006, 09:47:17 AM
Superman connects with Superman I and II in the way that the new Star Wars movies should have.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 01:51:34 PM
Why should the new Star Trek movies connect with Superman I and Superman II?  Next thing you're going to tell me is that Kirk and Spock were actually lovers.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TheJudge on July 07, 2006, 01:55:52 PM
Why would Kirk and Spock's sexual erm... exploits... be in any way connected to Star Wars which is apparently not connecting with Super Man I and II?  :-P
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 01:59:51 PM
Quick, someone send the Connections signal to James Burke.  We need his help stat!
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: foundation on July 07, 2006, 02:34:53 PM
This is getting confusing.  What I was saying is that the new Superman feels like it fits right in with the first 2 Superman movies in the way the new Star Wars movies should have connected to the original Star Wars movies.  Superman succeeded in picking up the franchise all these years later right where it left off.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TheJudge on July 07, 2006, 02:36:50 PM
Well, it was hard for star Wars to pick of where they left off when you consider it was a prequel.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: ivan on July 07, 2006, 02:46:04 PM
Would someone please fix the :vader: smilie in the  original "hate starwars" thread? (http://www.geekforum.org/index.php/topic,2376.msg38084.html#msg38084)

Thank you.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 03:00:27 PM
Hate Star Wars
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TheJudge on July 07, 2006, 03:06:47 PM
Why?
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 03:14:08 PM
Stupid
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TheJudge on July 07, 2006, 03:15:14 PM
explains
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 03:22:13 PM
:vader:
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: foundation on July 07, 2006, 03:33:56 PM
"Well, it was hard for star Wars to pick of where they left off when you consider it was a prequel."

Yes of course, I didn't mean it literally.  Just in terms of the feeling of the movie. 

Forget I made the anology.  I'm just saying I liked the new Superman and was pleasantly surprised.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: ivan on July 07, 2006, 03:35:58 PM
Pleasantly surprised by what?
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Demosthenes on July 07, 2006, 04:17:15 PM
Sorry.  I just think this thread needs a link to this:

A-Team Fan Fiction (http://www.ateamfanfic.org/)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 04:24:01 PM
I see your A-Team Fanfic and raise you a

FOLFF (http://www.fanfiction.net/l/666/3/0/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/1/)

look closely at the url...
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: foundation on July 07, 2006, 04:27:43 PM
"Pleasantly surprised " that Superman is as good as it is and that it fits so well with the first two movies.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: ivan on July 07, 2006, 04:33:07 PM
I'm sorry, I lost you. We were talking about Superman, right?
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: pbsaurus on July 07, 2006, 05:57:50 PM
Oh, this should help then (http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLM,GGLM:2006-08,GGLM:en&q=superman+facts+of+life+fanfic)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Scheherazade on July 26, 2006, 08:06:43 PM
I think Kevin Spacey made a great Lex Luther.

Plus he's HAWT.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: xolik on July 27, 2006, 01:24:39 PM
Plus he's HAWT.

(http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/6209/confusedwo0.gif)

*does a quick Google search*

(http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/9802/emothellnawvz2.gif)
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Evonus on July 27, 2006, 02:56:07 PM
(http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/6209/confusedwo0.gif)

*does a quick Google search*

(http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/9802/emothellnawvz2.gif)

Kevin Spacey is about as hot as antartica, in the winter.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: hackess on July 27, 2006, 07:43:59 PM
I find him intellectually attractive, but that's about it.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: TRAHALD on July 27, 2006, 10:14:34 PM
Taken from my Blog on 6/28/06:

Quote
Saw an early screening of Superman Returns last night.  This flick was definitly worth the wait.  I admit that I had concerns about Brandon Routh trying to fill Chris Reeves' shoes, but I was pleasantly surprised.  Every detail was meticulously laid bare before the audience under the watchfull eye of comic nerd/second messiah Bryan Singer.  The flick plays just like a good comic film should; it has a great plot without giving you all the info on a platter, it lays down the mythos for the origin without wasting time on a protracted origin story, and it plants some great seeds for rebooting the franchise.  I can only pray the WB doesn't utterly destroy the series the way Fox did the X-Men franchise with X3.  Damn right I'm still bitter about that one!  So go throw down the $10 to see the movie in theatres and have a great ride!
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Scheherazade on July 28, 2006, 07:23:23 AM
I find him intellectually attractive, but that's about it.

As do I, but I often find that if a man's sense of humor or personality attracts me, I become attracted to him physically.

Thus, Kevin Spacey is HAWT.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Min on July 31, 2006, 03:21:51 PM
I think Kevin Spacey is way hot.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Scheherazade on July 31, 2006, 03:29:02 PM
I think Kevin Spacey is way hot.

I couldn't agree more.
Title: Re: Superman
Post by: Agent_Tachyon on August 29, 2006, 04:50:05 PM
I just plain dislike Superman...my favourite comic for the longest time was DKR because he gets his super-ass handed to him by Batman at the end.

Now my favourite is Dark Knight Strikes Again because he gets his super-ass handed to him by the Flash, Atom, Green Arrow, and THEN Batman.