The Geek Forum

  • May 23, 2024, 01:51:14 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Due to the prolific nature of these forums, poster aggression is advised.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Arnox

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
76
I predict that once he reaches the 50 post minimum, Arnox is going to make 5-10 posts in the Technology forum, some of which asking our advice on certain technical things, and then we'll never see or hear from him again.  :)

Not so my friends, I swear it. :) lol Well, time to get started.
1. Pentium 4

77
But I'm not here to ask dumb questions about computers. Trust me, I know ALL about google/bing/yahoo whatever. They have saved my butt more than once. I'm here to simply found out more about programming and/or hacking and start some good tech discussions. I don't care if the topics don't get more than a page. As long as they have good posts.

78
Ok, but you have to ask 9 more times.

Really? I'd do it.

79
How about lowering the necessary post count then?

EDIT: Please?

80
I have the perfect solution.  Arnox, do you know any JOKES about COMPUTERS??  Post them in here!

After all, it's all about the funny really.  For me anyway.
If I can't get to 50 through this argument then I'll be sure to check it out. :-D Anyway, my second point of argument is that since this IS a very small forum, I do not think that you receive very many new members. Therefore, I do not think that the 50 post minimum is necessary if there are so few new members and even then, who says they will make tech support threads and then leave? TBH, the only reason why I know this board exists was because I was looking for a tech-oriented board in the google directory.

81
You persist in your delusion that this is some sort of a democracy.

But then, every delusional post brings you that much closer to 50.

82
I almost never talk about technology here.  There MUST be something else going on, no?

True, there are other things to talk about but I came here to talk computers.

83
It was a pretty weak argument.  You can do better than that.
I'm just starting my argument. :) Anyway, my first point to bring up is that this forum is almost completely centered on technology talk and should be open to anyone since it IS the main theme. Is it not? When you take that away it takes half of the boards purpose away.

84
SO does anyone here agree with me that the post count to post in the tech forum should be lowered?

85
I will now argue the 50 post limit and see if I can either:
1. Get the limit reduced to 20-25.
2. Reach 50 posts.

Why can't we lower it some? I mean, after somebody posts about 25 posts then I think he/she is eligible to post in all of the topics.

86
Anarchy / Re: Norwegian Aliens
« on: January 09, 2010, 02:13:24 AM »
Well someone could have projected that image on the clouds with a powerful image projector, I imagine, couldn't they?

87
Anarchy / Re: What is YOUR favourite Game?
« on: January 09, 2010, 02:08:34 AM »
Woah! favourite game? So many... how 'bout a 1-10 list?

1. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
2. Unreal Tournament '99
3. Crysis
4. Perfect Dark
5. Banjo Kazooie
6. Ninja Gaiden Black
7. Halo (all of them except the RTS one. :P)
8. The Elder Scrolls (all of them)
9. Aliens vs. Predator (FYI I <3 the xeno's)
10. Timesplitters: Future Perfect

88
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 30, 2009, 09:45:46 PM »
Actually, as geeks, we care very little about chewy and more about one's ability to put together a cogent argument about the things s/he believes and the ability to present said argument in in intelligent manner.

Since your original "argument" was neither intelligent nor cogent, we responded in kind.

I didn't know we were having a serious argument. Well, if you wanna do it THAT way. . .
I think I will just organize all the ways how I think 1-3 is better into a list so you guys can attack them as they are listed

1. More jedi's. :D
2. better animation/enviorments/etc.
3. They tie in everything that happened in 4-6 into a whole connected plot line very nicely.
4. More emotion in some of the acting.
5. Lightsaber battles are 10x better.
6. Overall the whole world feels more rich in personality than 4-6 which, in my opinion, had a very bland atmosphere. In other words all the little details that were in 1-3 helped to bring a lot of the personality out.

89
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 29, 2009, 02:04:35 AM »
That is why you fail.

Well it's clear that you guys care more about chewy then you do about me. I can't top that.

90
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 28, 2009, 01:40:23 PM »
Because Star Wars made him do things...

91
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 28, 2009, 12:24:05 AM »
And Chewy had a ten second cameo in episode 3 which makes the new trilogy suck even more.
Wow, I give up.

92
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 26, 2009, 08:02:09 PM »
Well Jar Jar was only in episode 1 mostly so there! :-P

93
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 25, 2009, 09:08:16 PM »
LOLOMFGROFLCOPTER.
How are you to know that no one cares hmm?
Fine then, for the next 10 of my posts you will not see a lol. But c'mon guys, everybody has an opinion on this here. POST IT I SAY!

94
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 25, 2009, 12:15:15 AM »
Nobody cares about Jar Jar binks sucking. lol

95
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 24, 2009, 06:50:57 PM »
Two words:  Jar Jar Binks also Chewy.

Nobody cares. lol

96
Entertainment / Re: Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 24, 2009, 06:47:42 PM »
I just watched II and one thing I didn't notice the first time was that the jedi extras in the last few scenes look, fittingly, a bit like Star Wars Kid, making silly poses and waving around lightsabers.
Bullcrap, you liked it.

97
Entertainment / Star Wars 1 through 3
« on: December 24, 2009, 12:44:23 AM »
Why is it that every time I here about star wars 1-3 it is about how they sucked compared to 4-6? Personally, I thought that episodes 1-3 were a lot better compared to 4-6. Am I the only person on the earth who thought 1-3 was better?

98
I had a similar dream involving Rudolph and his antlers.
lol

99
I have to tell you all that Frosty the Snowman is the most frightening phenomenon of the extra dimension. You can talk about the Abominable Snowman, you can talk about UFOs, all of these things, but when Frosty looks at you with those big coal eyes of his and he goes to work on you with that carrot nose? No sir-- no sir, no sir, no sir.

I had a nightnare about him once. He gave me his "carrot" and said I had to eat it.

100
Anarchy / Re: Funny pokemon story(s)/rant
« on: December 21, 2009, 06:05:11 PM »
I read it.

yeah, GSC is pretty much the hardest game to catch legendaries in. with the exception of suicune in crystal, either they can heal, or they run around the map like crazy and run when you do see them. generally you need to get then down to, say, 1 hp with false swipe, then put them to sleep, then spam ultra balls, then put to sleep, and repeat. usually you need about 20.

/stops to breathe

yeah, silver was the first game boy game I ever got.

Mine was the red edition. Anyway, yeah, maybe I should start up one more game thread about an FPS or something. I just KNOW that some of you at least have played an FPS game if not pokemon. How about UT99? I could talk forever and a day about that if I wanted too. :roll: lol

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5